1994 · 1995 · 1996 · 1997 · 1998 · 1999 · 2000 · 2001 · 2002 · 2003 · 2004       Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive

2004

January, 2004

• Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
• Re: O'reilly subjugated to the Lisp juggenaut (well, almost ;-)
• Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
• Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
• Re: OT Re: GNU CLISP 2.32 released
• Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
• Re: [OT] GNU CLISP 2.32 released
• Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
• Re: simple-array vs displaced-to
• Re: symbol name with case preserved
• Re: O'reilly subjugated to the Lisp juggenaut (well, almost ;-)
• Re: Macro to enable Perl-style strings
• Re: Question about &rest, &key, and &allow-other-keys
• Re: LISP apply question
• Re: Question about &rest, &key, and &allow-other-keys
• Re: Newbie: floating point optimization
• Re: XML->sexpr ideas
• Re: symbol name with case preserved
• Re: Spam [Was: Newbie: floating point optimization]
• Re: XML->sexpr ideas
• Re: Integer with base preserved!
• Re: Floating point arithmetic (epsilon)
• Re: XML->sexpr ideas
• Re: Integer with base preserved!
• Re: Spam
• Re: XML->sexpr ideas
• Re: Spam
• Re: Spam
• Re: XML->sexpr ideas
• Re: Mars Rover failure
• Re: Integer with base preserved!
• Re: Integer with base preserved!
• Re: MS discovers S-expressions
• Re: MS discovers S-expressions
• Re: Integer with base preserved!
• Re: builtin lists and Intel SSE support?
• Re: builtin lists and Intel SSE support?
• Re: builtin lists and Intel SSE support?
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: (open :direction :probe ...) vs probe-file
• Re: builtin lists and Intel SSE support?
• Re: (open :direction :probe ...) vs probe-file
• Re: MS discovers S-expressions
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: MS discovers S-expressions
• Re: stack overflow for ackerman
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: GNU libmatheval announcement
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: compile
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: intersection
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Static/Strong/Implicit Typing
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: intersection
• Re: intersection
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Lisp's future
• Re: Cello Rising
• Re: Cello Rising [was Re: Lisp's future]

February, 2004

• Re: State machine representation
• Re: State machine representation
• Re: Creating standalone executables
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: State machine representation
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: Creating standalone executables
• Re: plugins and lisp
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: Understanding #' and function variables
• Re: moderation of abuse?

Part of the Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive