Subject: Re: How is Lisp "better"? From: Erik Naggum <clerik@naggum.no> Date: 1998/08/17 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp.x,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme Message-ID: <3112331825579517@naggum.no> * sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) | ... and nonsense for Scheme. Scheme is not a Lisp in this regard (as in several others). if you insist on calling Scheme a Lisp, confusions like this will crop up. #:Erik -- http://www.naggum.no/spam.html is about my spam protection scheme and how to guarantee that you reach me. in brief: if you reply to a news article of mine, be sure to include an In-Reply-To or References header with the message-ID of that message in it. otherwise, you need to read that page.