Re: C++ gets dynamic redefinition (but does it wrong)

Subject: Re: C++ gets dynamic redefinition (but does it wrong)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 1998/12/03
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3121713617954595@naggum.no>

* Tim Bradshaw <tfb@aiai.ed.ac.uk>
| It's kind of funny how these things get reinvented.

  an old .signature has been reinstated for the occasion.

#:Erik
-- 
  those who do not know Lisp are doomed to reimplement it