Subject: Re: XML and lisp From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:05:27 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3207661527508051@naggum.net> * Barry Fishman <barry_fishman@acm.org> > Wouldn't attribute lists need to have a more `let' like syntax (and behavior). No. Please forget the attributes. There _are_ no attributes. Whether something is an attribute or not is completely arbitrary and irrelevant. Your access to that information is _not_ dependent on its rerepsentation in SGML/XML. Treat everything as a subordinate element. This is the key idea to gaining power of abstraction over the XML data. Holding on to the mythical distinction between attribute and sub-element is the key idea to losing any and all power of abstraction. > Just by " (emph "standardizing") " a straightforward mapping of XML into > and back from lisp, the uglyness and verbosity of XML would be less of an > issue. You could use the syntax you liked. I suspect when the > enthusiasm for XML has died down a bit, the benefits of a standardized > lisp notation could become better recognized. Please understand that that is what I was trying to do. The only way to deal with the mistake that they made in syntactically separating attributes from contents is to undo that mistake. Any and all catering to it is only making it worse. > You do need to step around the native lisp functions like quote. Huh? ///