Re: What should S-expression based languages be called? (was: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?)

Subject: Re: What should S-expression based languages be called?  (was: Re: Why  is Scheme not a Lisp?)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:13:16 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3225147207934879@naggum.net>

* Martti Halminen
| Another S-exp -style language would be one of the internal
| representations in the gcc compiler.

  The good old WAIS sources appeared to be using Common Lisp syntax using a
  format like (:source {<keyword> <value>}*).

///
-- 
  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.