Re: What should S-expression based languages be called? (was: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?)

Subject: Re: What should S-expression based languages be called?  (was: Re: Why is Scheme not a Lisp?)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 03:12:34 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3225237165705716@naggum.net>

* Kent M Pitman
| Perhaps the plain fact that it's more important that they feel themselves
| technically right than that they win friends?

  Hey, something wrong with that?

///
-- 
  In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none.
  In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.