Subject: Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme
From: rpw3@rigden.engr.sgi.com (Rob Warnock)
Date: 1997/04/04
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.scheme.scsh
Message-ID: <5i227h$2vu@tokyo.engr.sgi.com>

Scott Schwartz <schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu.NO-SPAM> wrote:
+---------------
| That's not an argument about lisp in the abstract, but
| a complaint about the typical poor quality of implementation that I've
| seen.  And, as we said above, siod is a notable exception.  Scsh
| (since this thread got crossposted there) is a fine example of the
| worst possible strategy, where an interesting design is spoiled by an
| inefficient implementation.
+---------------

So let's "R4RS-ize" SIOD just enough for "scsh" to run on top of it...  ;-}


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, 7L-551		rpw3@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Inc.		http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/
2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.		Phone: 415-933-1673  FAX: 415-933-4392
Mountain View, CA  94043	PP-ASEL-IA