Subject: Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:15:12 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <5pudnff9wpgNSADZnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
Juan R. <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
+---------------
| Takehiko Abe wrote:
| > > (* 1 2 3)
| > > looks "non-mathematical". I would prefer
| > > (* * 1 2 3)
| >
| > Ah. I guess Lisp is not for you then.
|
| Sorry was a typo
| 
| (* (* 1 2) 3)
+---------------

By the way, just so you know, (* * 1 2 3) *IS* a perfectly
legal Common Lisp form, if you ever really want to do that:  ;-}  ;-}

    > (+ 2 3)

    5
    > (* * 1 2 3)

    30
    >


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607