David Steuber <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
| rif <email@example.com> writes:
| > I have two ASDF systems, call them foo and bar. foo depends on bar.
| > In general, I'll say something like
| > (asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :foo)
| > The system loads. Now I make a change in bar. I again load foo with
| > the above command. bar recompiles, but foo does not recompile, even
| > though it depends on bar. This is problematic, since foo uses macros
| > (for instance) which are defined in bar.
| > Is there something obvious that I'm missing? What's the right way to
| > deal with this?
I'm not sure about *between* ASDF systems, but within a single one I
find myself using something like this:
(:file "foo" :depends-on (...whatever...)
:in-order-to ((compile-op (load-op "bar"))))
| That's an interesting question. When I'm developing, I edit and
| compile various definitions in my running image. I do this by editing
| the source and using SLIME's C-c C-c (and on occasion C-c C-k). So
| reloading the system definition is actually not something I ever do.
| So for me, ASDF is not about reloading or redefining anything.
Interesting. When developing web-based apps, I do exactly the opposite!! ;-}
During periods of active development, I make the "foo.lhp" (Lisp-Handled
Pages) file look like this:
;;; Boilerplate for using ASDF from LHP page.
(let ((system :foo)
(flet ((this-page (request)
;; Ensure up-to-date each time.
(asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op system)
;; Hack to avoid a package read error the very first time.
(funcall (intern (symbol-name function) package) request)))
That way, ASDF verifies that everything's up to date and (re)compiled
on *every* web hit. That makes the development cycle *very* tight:
edit a bit, do a "save" in the editor, hit "Reload" in the browser,
and *boom*! Everything gets recompiled and the browser pops up the
new version of the page. [Or doesn't, and I look at the application
server's REPL and/or the Apache error log to figure out why.]
Yes, it costs a few extra cycles per page-hit, but IMHO it's well
worth it. [...and you did notice that "during periods of active
development" qualifier, yes?]
Rob Warnock <firstname.lastname@example.org>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607