Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon@flownet.com> wrote:
| email@example.com (Rob Warnock) wrote:
| > Sorry for the imprecision, that's really what I meant by "thread-safe",
| > that *nobody* [in the same or another thread] could rebind it while
| > the cached address was being used.
| I understood what you meant, but I don't see why such a stringent
| requirement is needed. It seems to me that one thread rebinding a
| variable should have no affect on the cached value in a different thread.
Sorry, you're right. What I said was sufficient for safety, but not
minimal (strictly necessary).
Back to our common point: Even given adequate attention to safety,
a special variable may be accessed many times with only one double-
indirection, so that the per-thread glovar/dynvar table approach
doesn't have to be expensive.
Rob Warnock <firstname.lastname@example.org>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607