Re: Beating the dead horse again about VB

Subject: Re: Beating the dead horse again about VB
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 1999/03/27
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3131534674877050@naggum.no>

* Marcel K Haesok <Haesok@earthlink.net>
| I am a relative rookie, but after perusing the language ngs, I came to
| the following conlusion:

| <<<The "near/medium term future of computing" involves several keywords
| and they are-- among others---'networking', 'internet', 'OO',
| 'portability', 'AI' and 'marketting power'>>>;

  this isn't a statement of a conclusion of an argument.

| Tell me where my argument is flawed.

  easy: there is no argument, just a marketingese catch-phrase.  and all we
  can say about such is that the future is believed to be made out of them,
  but the present is not.

#:Erik