Subject: Re: There has got to be a better way... From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 1999/04/26 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3134139360212576@naggum.no> * paul_rudin@scientia.com | At the risk of rehashing old ground: what is "unnecessary" waste is | partly a matter of opinion. The space and/or time efficiency of lots of | code can be improved on. The question is how much effort one wants to | invest in doing so. I can understand why you cons up new articles with the same old defense for the same old unskilled Lisp style rather than reuse existing defenses by reference... #:Erik