Subject: Re: CMUCL and EQUAL hash tables From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 1999/06/04 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3137523282475496@naggum.no> * fredrik@hal.sby.abo.fi (Fredrik Sandstrom) | There never was a substitute for understanding the problem before trying | to respond. ;-) touché | However, I notice that my original sentence above is misleading -- I did | not use an array with a fill-pointer as a hash key, but I used one to do | hash table lookup. The transcript should have made this clear. ok, I tend to ignore examples when whatever they are intended to be examples of is sufficiently well explained. that didn't work this time. looking at your transcript, I agree that GETHASH should work with any old string EQUAL to the key. #:Erik -- @1999-07-22T00:37:33Z -- pi billion seconds since the turn of the century