Subject: Re: compiler technology (was: Re: CMU CL vs. CLISP?) From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 1999/07/27 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3142072824912106@naggum.no> * Bruno Haible | But I was also talking about CMUCL - how should they get at such a machine? your point is certainly valid for CMUCL, but your extrapolation to other native Common Lisp implementations leaves something to be desired in its applicability. #:Erik -- suppose we blasted all politicians into space. would the SETI project find even one of them?