Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture

Subject: Re: Avoiding unintentional variable capture
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 1999/09/10
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3145965845586287@naggum.no>

* Reini Urban
| using macros just not to evaluate one of its arguments is lame. 
| lambdas are better.

  then why don't you just program in Scheme?  sometimes, I think the Lisp1
  vs Lispn thing really _is_ about doing things one way or one of n ways.

  what I really _don't_ understand is why Scheme freaks need to _prove_
  Kent's points.  it would seem much more rational to work very hard to
  _disprove_ all his claims.

#:Erik
-- 
  it's election time in Norway.  explains everything, doesn't it?