Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 1999/09/20 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3146819103603024@naggum.no> * Raffael Cavallaro | As for me, I don't understand why posters to this forum take Erik's posts | at face value, and don't consider the probability that he'll squirm 12 | ways from sunday just to avoid losing an argument on usenet. funny, that's how you look to me, the way you invent more and more things to accuse me of. if you had been willing to stick to a single point and ride it through, you might make it possible to win or lose, but since you try one thing, then try another when it fails, and yet another when that fails, it's hard to conclude otherwise than that you refuse to admit to have lost at every junction. and now it is of course my fault that you have made a huge stink about your opinion of me (the "With friends like Erik" thread of your). don't you see that you could just shut the fuck up with your insane drivel, and nobody would need to respond to you? so, instead of pontificating about the motives of others, answer this question: why do _you_ keep going on, Raffael Cavallaro? and please throw in an analysis of why your posts contribute to the well-being of this newsgroup while you're at it. I'm looking forward to your insight into your own behavior, who has so much to offer about that of others. #:Erik