From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!
Date: 2000/03/07
Message-ID: <3161460533760438@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 594586432
References: <gat-0603001441540001@milo.jpl.nasa.gov> <8a2naf$e4v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38C4EE83.AF3BDA64@pindar.com> <8a2t3p$hpv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8a32uj$m10$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <ey33dq2u8bx.fsf@cley.com> <38C53ED0.5639924A@ncgr.org> <3161448495156937@naggum.no> <38C63672.53903056@fisec.com>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 952494880 15420 195.0.192.66 (8 Mar 2000 05:54:40 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 2000 05:54:40 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Robert Monfera <monfera@fisec.com>
| How can you tell?

  huh?  through the high number of people who reinvent it in various ways,
  and the low number of people who point out that they are reinventing
  existing functionality whenever this happens.  isn't this quite obvious?

#:Erik