From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: setq x setf
Date: 2000/06/16
Message-ID: <3170137817405233@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 635264256
References: <0f106a56.4f744979@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com> <aT625.10$4p1.258@burlma1-snr2> <sashank-1506001511560001@129.59.212.53> <3170098053699025@naggum.no> <sid25.66$4p1.1115@burlma1-snr2>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961149295 16037 195.0.192.66 (16 Jun 2000 09:54:55 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Jun 2000 09:54:55 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net>
| Assumptions don't have reasons.

  Sigh.  "Why" does not only refer to reasons, regardless of the truth
  of your statement, but to any cause, as in "how come".  Perhaps your
  assumptions are causeless and entirely random, but this is not a
  universal truth.

#:Erik
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.