From ...
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: Lisp XML parser ?
Date: 2000/06/25
Message-ID: <3170880537253039@naggum.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 638602962
References: <39523341.CED20EE@bbn.com> <3170682110777797@naggum.no> <3dm3kuya.fsf@supelec.fr>
mail-copies-to: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no
X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961893313 8956 195.0.192.66 (25 Jun 2000 00:35:13 GMT)
Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 2000 00:35:13 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp

* Fabrice Popineau <Fabrice.Popineau@supelec.fr>
| And what about DOM ???

  Yes?  What about DOM?  Giving something an alternate representation
  and _nothing_ else does not constitute giving it meaning.  Besides,
  I wrote what I think about DOM in <3170682110777797@naggum.no>:

    (And DOM is an incredibly ridiculous misunderstanding of "object
    oriented technology".)

#:Erik
-- 
  If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.