From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Degree in Shell Quoting Date: 2000/06/25 Message-ID: <3170945256296977@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 638814448 References: mail-copies-to: never Supersedes: <3170944372138469@naggum.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 961956459 5731 195.0.192.66 (25 Jun 2000 18:07:39 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jun 2000 18:07:39 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Clayton Weaver | On a related issue, I agree that shell quoting is a ridiculously | complex discipline to thrust upon the webtv generation. It's unclear to me who you agree with. | It's too far from their real concerns, since most of them aren't | "fine points of context-dependent token recognition" aficionados. That's not what quoting is about, so what is this? | I just don't agree that exporting gui windows (or compiled object | code executable by remote guis, ie Active Security Breach) over | telecom backbones is necessarily the only solution to the problem. I must have missed something. Is anyone favoring this? #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.