From ... From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Access the the second return value? Date: 2000/06/28 Message-ID: <3171189838798439@naggum.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 639996540 References: <3959B48D.835EA63E@spam.com> <87aeg65h7a.fsf@q-software-solutions.com> mail-copies-to: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@eunet.no X-Trace: oslo-nntp.eunet.no 962202528 28220 195.0.192.66 (28 Jun 2000 14:28:48 GMT) Organization: Naggum Software; vox: +47 8800 8879; fax: +47 8800 8601; http://www.naggum.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jun 2000 14:28:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp * Johan Kullstam | there's no accounting for taste. i happen to like ? and ! over the | more traditional p and f. f? If this is what I think it is, namely a truly _perverted_ Schemocentric world-view where Scheme's ridiculous set! is deemed the model for setf, there _is_ accounting for taste: Scheme is bad for young people's brains. | just because this notation comes from scheme doesn't necessarily | make it bad. No, not _necessarily_, but it doesn't help. Everything good in Scheme is already adopted by every other language. Being a minimalist language, that means whatever is left is just trash waiting for the last reference to go before it is collected and carted out. | you may actually be the only one this bothered. Not so. #:Erik -- If this is not what you expected, please alter your expectations.