Subject: Re: is lisp a general purpose lang? From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:22:18 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3226836154782491@naggum.net> * Julian Stecklina | Ok, you can read this way, but it destroys all the pleasure of | reading. Reading is some kind of work then. And you have to | concentrate to really understand what you have read. When you started to learn to read, it was all like this. It was pretty hard work by adult standard, but then you got the hang of it and it became effortless. The same goes for reading faster. Indeed, all thinking skills are very hard work when you are not training for them. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief.