Subject: Re: Known inconsistencies or bugs in CLHS? From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:20:14 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3227635213854286@naggum.net> * Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org> | could you please evaluate the following forms in the implementation you | are using and show us the results? thanks No. That is a _completely_ bogus approach to resolving this issue. | Which one is it in your implementation? Irrelevant. I am discussing language issues, not implementation issues. I may consider an implementation broken after I understand the language issue, and whether I used to use it or not is completely irrelevant and the question a gave insult to those who want to help you resolve a language issue. If you were talking public polls about what various implementations were doing, you should have said so from the start. EOD. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief. Post with compassion: http://home.chello.no/~xyzzy/kitten.jpg