Subject: Re: lisp as a mutiple team programming language? From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:29:27 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3228427766731355@naggum.net> * Kenny Tilton | The downside is that average folk get crippled resumes because no one | else wants their skills. * Erik Naggum > If they can learn one domain-specific language in a reasonable amount of > time and become proficient in it, why would they be unable to repeat such > an endeavor? * Kenny Tilton <ktilton@nyc.rr.com> | I said the resumes were crippled, not them. | | woof! You are barking up the wrong tree. Please realize that I was arguing against the notion that the resumes would be "crippled" -- if they had acquired a skill in a short amount of time, that should be valuable, etc. /// -- In a fight against something, the fight has value, victory has none. In a fight for something, the fight is a loss, victory merely relief. Post with compassion: http://home.chello.no/~xyzzy/kitten.jpg