Subject: Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 25 Sep 2002 00:23:57 +0000 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3241902237839465@naggum.no> * Greg Bacon | - A line in the body of a post is considered to be original if it | does *not* match the regular expression /^\s{0,3}(?:>|:|\S+>|\+\+)/. I cannot make sense of that regexp, but it fails to capture my quoting convention while allowing for a number of others. It should be tuned for this newsgroup. Since I appear to produce more original content than I do, the numbers are more than slightly off mark for the "OCR" bit. | - The scanner prefers the Reply-To: header over the From: header | in determining the "real" e-mail address and name. Why? This seems completely bogus to me and might indicate that it has been tuned for a different newsgroup. | Excluded Posters | ================ | | perlfaq-suggestions\@mox\.perl\.com And if this is not a dead giveaway of the dangers of Perl reuse, nothing is. -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.