Re: (package-name "not a name") -> type-error or package-error?

Subject: Re: (package-name "not a name") -> type-error or package-error?
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 02 Nov 2002 20:13:54 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3245256834203000@naggum.no>

* Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
| If we "ignore package designators", the situation is trivial: if the
| argument to PACKAGE-NAME is not a PACKAGE, it is a TYPE-ERROR.

  Good boy!  You got the point exactly.  It is not a `package-error´.

| You missed your general aim as well as your specific goal.

  Oh, Christ.  Grow the hell up.  You are not even able to focus on the
  question you asked.

  Somebody else can babysit you.  What a fucking waste to answer you.

-- 
Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway

Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder.
Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.