Subject: Re: CLEmacs From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 09 Nov 2002 18:09:08 +0000 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3245854148260927@naggum.no> * Gabe Garza | This is a loaded thread to jump into (though most are :)), but I think | the "right" clemacs wouldn't be "emacs with Common Lisp instead of emacs | lisp", I think it would be a programmable text editor that would be part | of a larger GUI framework. But once you had Common Lisp, would anyone want to implement an Emacs Lisp engine or compiler or byte-code jit compiler or whatever because they missed just about everything from GNU Emacs? I think so. If that turned out to be painful, I think they would leave. -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder. Now showing on CNN: Harry Potter and the Search for Weapons of Mass Destruction