Re: (endp lst) or (null lst) - Naggum cll archive

Subject: Re: (endp lst) or (null lst)
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 05 Jan 2003 01:05:03 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3250717503208873@naggum.no>

* Chris Gehlker <gehlker@fastq.com>
| Either I'm very confused or the examples are in the wrong order (or
| both).

  Which order did you expect the examples to be in?

| It seems more efficient to simply test with consp and avoid
| examining the terminal cons.

  I thought that was exactly what I said.

  Now I am puzzled.  Did you /only/ look at (the order of) the
  examples?

-- 
Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway

Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder.
Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.