Subject: Re: please review my new *working* code - now with 20% more oop!
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:14:00 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <-tadnW0HDM1F1D7UnZ2dnUVZ_i2WnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
Thomas A. Russ <tar@sevak.isi.edu> wrote:
+---------------
| david <notmas@gmail.com> writes:
| > i am thinking cll is no big on quick and dirty :)
| 
| Actually, lisp is ideal for quick and dirty.
...
| Of course, we do prefer the adjective "agile" to "quick and dirty". ;-)
+---------------

(*sigh*) I wished you'd mentioned that several years ago.
I could have named my toy CL subset "Agile Lisp" instead
of "Quick and Dirty Lisp" (QDL)!!  ;-}  ;-}


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607