Richard A. O'Keefe <ok@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote:
+---------------
| The "strong" Whorf-Sapir hypothesis ("POSSIBLE to think" = "possible to
| say") is false.
| The "weak" Whorf-Sapir hypothesis ("EASY to think" = "easy to say")
| is pretty much obvious.
+---------------
True, but to me the more interesting/useful form is the contrapositive
of the "weak" version [the "pretty-strong" version?] -- "If it can't
be said easily in any language one knows, it's quite difficult for one
to think or reason about it" -- which I would claim *does* have considerable
applicability to the art of programming [not to mention a myriad of
personal/religious/philosphical contemplations].
After all, one of the beauties of Lisp/Scheme programming is that if
you're having trouble trying to cleanly express something, you can
CHANGE THE LANGUAGE to make it easier to express.
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock, 7L-551 rpw3@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Inc. http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/
2011 N. Shoreline Blvd. Phone: 415-933-1673 FAX: 415-933-0979
Mountain View, CA 94043 PP-ASEL-IA