Thomas F. Burdick <tfb@famine.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
+---------------
| Ingvar Mattsson <ingvar@cathouse.bofh.se> writes:
| > ...vastly more interesting. At least a couple of years back, where a
| > source-built C++ app usually worked, but a "grabbed binary for
| > royughly the same versions" woked only occasionally.
|
| You're talking about Linux here, right? This wasn't a big problem on
| Solaris. The ABI changed a little, but they kept it to a minimum as
| the language changed -- none of that, "It's a new month, we need a new
| ABI" crap that afflicted the GNU tools.
+---------------
FreeBSD tries to maintain backwards-compatibility, too. I just installed
4.9-RELEASE, and they have compatibility libraries you can install to run
binaries built for stuff as far back as FreeBSD 1.x. This was especially
useful for me since I had some binaries built for FreeBSD 2.2.6 that I
needed to keep working. With the "compat22" libraries installed, they do.
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607