Subject: Re: reverse!
From: rpw3@rigden.engr.sgi.com (Rob Warnock)
Date: 2000/03/12
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Message-ID: <8aeugh$jrb40$1@fido.engr.sgi.com>
Joe Marshall  <jmarshall@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
+---------------
| cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (Christopher Browne) writes:
| > The main reason for using destructive operators is if they wind up
| > being much *faster* than their less destructive brethren.
| 
| That's a big IF.
+---------------

Yup. Particularly if you're using a high-performance generational
copying garbage collector. Destructive (mutating) ops can be *slower*
than their functional equivalents in such an environment.


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, 41L-955		rpw3@sgi.com
Applied Networking		http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/
Silicon Graphics, Inc.		Phone: 650-933-1673
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy.		PP-ASEL-IA
Mountain View, CA  94043