Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> wrote:
+---------------
| * Courageous <jkraska1@san.rr.com>
| | I know this is possible one way or the other, for I have seen automatic
| | deep copy implemented via code generation in C++.
|
| I'm sorry, but you have been tricked. just because it exists for C++ is
| not in any way, shape, or form an argument for the _correctness_ of the
| implementation or the algorithm or even the concept to begin with.
+---------------
Indeed. Perhaps it's time once again to drag out Kent Pitman's classic
"Parenthetically Speaking" article on the subject:
<URL:http://world.std.com/~pitman/PS/EQUAL.html>
The Best of Intentions: EQUAL Rights--and Wrongs--in Lisp
which addresses the question "Why is there no generic COPY function?"
[in Common Lisp], and explains why any so-called "automatic" deep copy
is inherently *wrong*.
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock, 41L-955 rpw3@sgi.com
Applied Networking http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/
Silicon Graphics, Inc. Phone: 650-933-1673
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy. PP-ASEL-IA
Mountain View, CA 94043