Subject: Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 03:30:16 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.functional
Message-ID: <DN-dnRfxYOiFzv3ZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
Pisin Bootvong <joesb.coe9@gmail.com> wrote:
+---------------
| No matter how scalable your language is, you cannot make a 100MHz/128MB
| server serve 100,000 client a second over the internet.
+---------------

Sure you can! That's ~1000 CPU cycles/request, which [assuming at least
a 100BASE-TX NIC] is plenty to service 100K *small* requests/s...  ;-}

Of course, you might have to write it in assembler on bare metal,
but the good news is that with only a 1000 cycle budget, at least
the code won't be very large!  ;-}


-Rob [someone who remembers 0.5 MIPS DEC PDP-10s being used
      for >100 simultaneous commercial timesharing users]

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607