mark.hoemmen@gmail.com <mark.hoemmen@gmail.com> wrote:
+---------------
| rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) wrote:
| > [And if you're not going to use "=", then
| > you would need an additional :EPSILON keyword to specify the acceptable
| > error in the comparison, and that's just getting ugly...]
|
| Well, you only need to fix "EPSILON" once and then you compute
| relative error for everything. There's no need to specify a different
| EPSILON for each operation.
+---------------
That statement would have gotten an "F" in my college's
Numerical Methods class. Acceptable relative error *does*
depend on context...
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607