Subject: Re: Your Guru Paul Graham is getting trashed on Slashdot.
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:51:54 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.java.programmer
Message-ID: <acSdnScca4an3I3cRVn-vw@speakeasy.net>
Rahul Jain  <rjain@nyct.net> wrote:
+---------------
| Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:
| > Yeah, it's always sort of bizarre to see people complaining about this
| > when for a real lisp programmer, it's Simply Not An Issue ...
| 
| What I don't get is why people using C-like languages don't abandon it
| for needing many times more parentheses than Lisp code written by
| someone who isn't trying to wear out whatever key the paren is on.
+---------------

See a related discussion going on over in "comp.arch" (and cross-posted
to *entirely* too many places) about whether languages should provide
"general" N-ary operators. E.g., one of the proposals was to allow this:

    a < b < c < d < e < f

to mean exactly what CL already provides with far fewer keystrokes!  ;-}

    (< a b c d e f)


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607