Subject: Re: Next Generation of Language
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:06:11 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <cb2dncx2oPyulDrYnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@speakeasy.net>
Tim Bradshaw <tfb+google@tfeb.org> wrote:
+---------------
| Chris Barts wrote:
| > How many people have forgotten that 'code' is a mass noun and, as such,
| > does not take plurals? Do you also say 'these muds' and 'these dusts'?
| 
| How many people have forgotten that *language changes over time* and is
| not something handed down from the elder days, never to be changed?
| The sense of `codes' I gave is very common in the HPC community where
| "a code" typically refers to something approximating to a particular
| implementation of an algorithm.  The plural use, which is more common,
| means something like "implementations of algorithms".
+---------------

Yup. Far too much of the HPC market consists of simply rerunning 1960's
"dusty deck" codes with different inputs and larger array dimensions.


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607