Subject: Re: PLOT: A non-parenthesized, infix Lisp!
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:23:43 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <kbGdnehfsqYy4nPUnZ2dnUVZ_gBi4p2d@speakeasy.net>
Zach Beane  <xach@xach.com> wrote:
+---------------
| George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:
| > I like Lisp - but let's be honest - Lisp doesn't make bit munging
| > easy.  Nor does any modern statically typed language I have tried.
| 
| I've heard many Lisp people say this (usually with the same disclaimer),
| but I don't find it to be true personally. The same things that make
| Lisp great for programming in general also make it great for me to do
| whatever bit munging I need.
+---------------

Ditto!

+---------------
| What sort of bit munging do you have in mind when you say this?
| What do you think of Rob Warnock's public adventures in bit munging?
+---------------

Heh. I just made a parallel reply with some more toy examples...  ;-}


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607