Subject: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:13:26 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <vtCdndXOhO27XV3YnZ2dnUVZ_hynnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
Tim Bradshaw <tfb+google@tfeb.org> wrote:
+---------------
| Paul Wallich <p...@panix.com> wrote:
| > The big question is whether inefficient use of cores is a bad thing.
| 
| It's a bad thing because it's making poor use of expensive silicon.
+---------------

And even poorer use of all that extra leakage current
[excess heat, a.k.a. wasted electricity]. As the cores get
smaller & smaller, the idle power becomes a larger and larger
fraction of the full-out running power. So fewer cores used
more efficiently means more computations/kW-hr than many
cores used less efficiently, even if the computations/hr
happens to be the same.


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607