Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?

Subject: Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Date: 2000/03/02
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3161001459566142@naggum.no>

* "Andrew McDowell" <drew.mcdowell@msfc.nasa.gov>
| So just give up without trying?

  no.  the only alternative to naive optimism is not depressed cynicism, OK?

#:Erik