1994 · 1995 · 1996 · 1997 · 1998 · 1999 · 2000 · 2001 · 2002 · 2003 · 2004       Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive

2000

January, 2000

• Re: lisp compiler
• Re: About the usage of throw/catch
• Re: Comparison of LISP Compilers and translators
• Re: About the usage of throw/catch
• Re: format directive "~{...~}"
• Re: format directive "~{...~}"
• Re: Would you please criticize this routine?
• Re: postings screened?
• Re: quick guide
• Re: inspect
• Re: Returning the name of a function
• Re: XLISP, XLISP-PLUS and XLISP-STAT
• Re: Speed, Faster... Faster... Slower?
• Re: Returning the name of a function
• Re: Returning the name of a function
• Re: Entirely off-topic (is OO any good)
• Re: Transmeta's Crusoe as a host for neo-Lispm, or not?
• Re: how to append an item to a list ?
• Re: [Q]: Need help with cons
• Re: [Q]: Recursion help
• Re: [Q]: Recursion help
• Re: setf implementation
• Re: Would COMPILER-MACRO cut it?
• Re: [Q] More beginner help
• Re: Transmeta's Crusoe as a host for neo-Lispm, or not?
• Re: [Q] More beginner help
• Re: [Q] More beginner help
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: [Q] More beginner help
• Re: CL for WindowsNT?
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: Transmeta's Crusoe as a host for neo-Lispm, or not?
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: Would COMPILER-MACRO cut it?
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: Lisp and Scheme.....
• Re: Copyrighted header files (was: reading/writing...)
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: Lisp and Scheme.....
• Re: Lisp and Scheme.....
• Re: CL for WindowsNT?

February, 2000

• Re: looking up entries in a table of ranges
• Re: Interned Symbols and GC
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: What is LISP?
• Re: Interned Symbols and GC
• Re: Querying whether there is a method which is applicable for an arglist
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: beginner question on input from large files
• Re: [N]TRUNCATE-LIST ?
• Re: What is LISP?
• Re: Beginners course
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: emacs lisp help
• Re: reading/writing bytes smaller than 8 bits?
• Re: Beginners course
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: Help with easy checksum
• Re: continuations and cl
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: About the usage of throw/catch
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: emacs lisp help
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: Why no standard foreign language interface?
• Re: Benefits of tail recursion (was: Cost of Recursion)
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: floor
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: Are there any LISP development systems that are VC, or other GUI IDE like?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: character Comparison
• Re: The inverse of optional arguments.
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: More Scope...
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: More Scope...
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: [constants] from a reader macro
• Re: [constants] from a reader macro
• Re: [constants] from a reader macro
• Re: [constants] from a reader macro
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: (loop for ? in ? finally ?)
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: More Scope...
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: (loop for ? in ? finally ?)
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Good data-structure for characters in editor buffer?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Lisp (and other language) teaching again
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: More Scope...
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: common lisp online resource?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Lisp (and other language) teaching again
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32
• Re: Freeware Common lisp compiler?
• Re: question on sort
• Re: another weird question
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: setq Question.
• Re: (loop for ? in ? finally ?)
• Re: Private message received from EN
• Re: Private message received from EN

March, 2000

• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: Private message received from EN
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: setq Question.
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Dynamic bindings and lightweight processes
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Dynamic bindings and lightweight processes
• Re: best CL type for fixed decimal values
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: best CL type for fixed decimal values
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: A modest proposal (long)
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: Erik (Was Re: Allegro CL 5.0 Win32)
• Re: That place.. (was: How to make a mutually recursive macro and function)
• Re: Franz Trial Version 5.0
• Re: That place.. (was: How to make a mutually recursive macro and function)
• Re: Types (in arrays)
• Re: Time in Lisp
• Re: [executables] was: why Haskell hasn't replaced CL yet?
• Re: That place.. (was: How to make a mutually recursive macro and function)
• Re: Private message received from EN
• Re: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!
• Re: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!
• Re: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!
• Re: cwcc in CL [was Re: That place.. ]
• Re: [Q] Sorting a Hash
• Re: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!
• Re: newbie Lisp question
• Re: newbie Lisp question
• Re: newbie Lisp question
• Re: Inline Functions (was: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!)
• Re: Inline Functions (was: Eureka! Lexical bindings can be guaranteed!)
• Re: Feature allocation
• Re: Referential transparency support missing
• Re: Testing approaches
• Re: Who used the "D" word?
• Re: stupid question regarding #
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Who used the "D" word?
• Re: ACL bug (was: Re: Series 2.1 released)
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Who used the "D" word?
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: Search & Replace in sequences
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: strings and characters
• Re: Setting logical hosts and translations for a directory hierarchy
• Re: Macro question (bizarre)
• Re: Building a "loadable" tar file.
• Re: new to lisp (3rd time lucky)
• Re: Common Lisp interpretation by emacs
• Re: Common Lisp interpretation by emacs
• Re: setf & setq, newbie needs short definitions/examples
• Re: Common Lisp interpretation by emacs
• Re: Common Lisp interpretation by emacs
• Re: shall I learn LISP??
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Summary of Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: can lisp do what perl does easily?
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: concatenated-stream - which component is being read from?
• Re: [Q]How to evaluate a string as lisp code?
• Re: Help required: Is there a way to split up one element into several?
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Threads
• Re: When would it be better to use recursion than a loop?
• Re: Help required: Is there a way to split up one element into several?
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses

April, 2000

• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Alternatives to EVAL
• Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
• Re: Help required: Is there a way to split up one element into several?
• Re: howto string->symbol
• Re: howto string->symbol
• Re: concatenated-stream - which component is being read from?
• Re: howto string->symbol
• Re: Alternatives to EVAL
• Re: more questions about threads...
• Re: setf functions
• Re: howto string->symbol
• Re: more questions about threads...
• Re: more questions about threads...
• Re: more questions about threads...
• Re: setf functions
• Re: more questions about threads...
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: basic question (probably w/ no good answer)
• Re: basic question (probably w/ no good answer)
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: AllegroCL: How to write a huge list in one line
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: list problem and NTH, READ, STRCAT
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: How To make '(--a) equals 'a
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: How To make '(--a) equals 'a
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: Loop Syntax
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: setf & setq - revisiting
• Re: On the quality of this newsgroup, was: Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: R: newbie question about symbols
• Re: On the quality of this newsgroup, was: Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: How does Lisp implement Primitive, Structured and User-defined data types?
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: On the quality of this newsgroup, was: Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: On the quality of this newsgroup, was: Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: [specialized arrays] which lisp has them?
• Re: How does Lisp implement Primitive, Structured and User-defined data types?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: [specialized arrays] which lisp has them?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: DEAR ERIK:
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: DEAR ERIK:
• Re: Converting a string to a list
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: difference between &rest and &body
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Deep copy in lisp: how?
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Short question: the letter n
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: Short question: the letter n
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of languagedeficiencies?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: how to validate input?
• Re: Heap- vs. stack-based fn call frames, was: how to validate input?
• Re: Heap- vs. stack-based fn call frames, was: how to validate input?
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: Short question: the letter n
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: DEAR ERIK:
• Re: Seems like Erik uses tentacles (Was Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of languagedeficiencies?)
• Re: Bring back Xah!
• Re: Are macros really a neccessity, or a coverup of language deficiencies?
• Re: Decls in Loop
• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: (documentation 'some-function 'function)

May, 2000

• Re: getting a full symbol name
• Re: Decls in Loop
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: Interfacing to C code
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: Dynamics of HTML
• Re: LISP and AI
• Re: better hyperlinking (Re: LISP and AI)
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: lisp and threads
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Sick today
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Lisp & SICP
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: One lisp many emacs connections?
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: Wish list item: , in integers made readable
• Wish list item: , in integers made readable
• Re: Squalling Brats Flinging Dung At One Another Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: environments for learning LISP
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: How make an abstract class in CLOS?
• Re: How make an abstract class in CLOS?
• Re: global variables when making executables in Allegro?
• Re: How can i let Franz Allegro Common Lisp use the percentage of using the processor?
• Re: How make an abstract class in CLOS?
• Re: How make an abstract class in CLOS?
• Re: How can i let Franz Allegro Common Lisp use the percentage of using the processor?
• Re: global variables when making executables in Allegro?
• Re: deleting a nth element of a list
• Re: How can i let Franz Allegro Common Lisp use the percentage of using the processor?
• Re: Case-sensitivity: why -- or why not? (was Re: Damnation!)

June, 2000

• Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
• Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
• Re: Squalling Brats Flinging Dung At One Another Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
• Re: scaling and linking?
• Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: [NOISE] Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: increase Lisp visibility
• Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: Innovation and APIs (Re: What Lisp to choose?)
• Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: What Lisp to choose?
• Re: String to real
• Re: String to real
• Re: ACL bug in (tanh x) ?
• Re: ACL bug in (tanh x) ?
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: String to real
• Re: Servlets in CL
• Re: parse-float trial implementation (was Re: String to real)
• Re: parse-float trial implementation (was Re: String to real)
• Re: String to real
• Re: Print hash table?
• Re: Readable hash tables
• Re: Lisp - First Impressions
• Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
• Re: `letf' in Common Lisp?
• Re: Readable hash tables
• Re: Rob Pike article
• Re: Rob Pike article
• Re: Allegro CL foreign function interface
• Re: Rob Pike article
• Re: RFC about "Object Oriented Programming in Common Lisp"
• Re: Rob Pike article
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: Allegro CL foreign function interface
• Re: peek-char and eof-error-p
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: setq x setf
• Re: Rob Pike article
• Re: unicode
• Re: unicode
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: teaching and learning with LISP/Scheme
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: unicode
• Re: unicode
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: the evil of continuations
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: the evil of continuations
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Question on converting string to symbol
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: argc (omitted argv[0] in count, corrected)
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: Question on converting string to symbol
• Re: Question on converting string to symbol
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: Print after mp:process-run-function crashes command line execution...
• Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
• Re: argc ("-handling -multiple -args -that -look -like -1 -arg")
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Affordable Common Lisp implementations on Win95/98/NT?
• Re: lisp editors
• Re: lisp editors
• Re: Degree in Shell Quoting
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Degree in Shell Quoting
• Re: lisp editors
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: lisp editors
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: The new language from M$
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Newbie Q. How do I use sockets?
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Lisp XML parser ?
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Macros vs Functions and a question about check-type
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: C# : The new language from M$
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Newbie asking for help
• Re: Reading bitmap files with lisp.
• Re: [noise] manglish [was: lisp editors]
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)

July, 2000

• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Hyperspec typo for progn2?
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: EVAL-WHEN question (and maybe a bug in clisp/cmucl)
• Re: Access the the second return value?
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: Controlling the expansion of a macro
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: newbie: please don't smash my case
• Re: newbie: please don't smash my case
• Re: C# is not Dylan (was: Re: C# : The new language from M$)
• Re: newbie: please don't smash my case
• Re: newbie: please don't smash my case
• Re: Controlling the expansion of a macro
• Re: Separation in function and value cells (was Re: newbie: please don't smash my case)
• Re: Separation in function and value cells (was Re: newbie: please don't smash my case)
• Re: gensym vs make-symbol [was: Re: newbie: please don't smash my case ]
• Re: Is lisp this slow?
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: Separation in function and value cells (was Re: newbie: please don't smash my case)
• Re: gensym vs make-symbol [was: Re: newbie: please don't smash my case ]
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: [offtopic] Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: How fast can lisp go?
• Re: Injecting some sense into the C++ vs. Lisp debate
• Re: Injecting some sense into the C++ vs. Lisp debate
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: OO-Browser does not understand Lisp defstruct options?
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: Pass by ref & generalized assignment
• Re: Pass by ref & generalized assignment
• Re: defmacro question
• Re: Type declarations
• Re: Get subseq of alist using regexp mathcing on cars
• Re: defmacro question
• Re: defmacro question
• Re: Get subseq of alist using regexp mathcing on cars
• Re: Function Evaluation Problems in ACL
• Re: Curious about functional programming

August, 2000

• Re: question on sort
• Re: A tiny lisp without numbers: The Computional Beauty of Nature
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: string printing within specified margins
• Re: CL-HTTP and AllegroServe license agreement
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Lisp Syntax #| ???
• Re: how to get groups out of match-regexp
• Re: string processor
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Need help with Allegro match-regexp
• Re: Education/Reading
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: CL-HTTP and AllegroServe license agreement
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Curious about functional programming
• Re: Anyone remembers LISPOS?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: soft refs (weak pointers)
• Re: Mini Resumes
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Anyone remembers LISPOS?
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: What are parentheses for? (was Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses ...)
• Re: What are parentheses for? (was Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses ...)
• Re: What are parentheses for? (was Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses ...)
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: Q about inter-app comm
• Re: detecting circular lists
• Re: return-from in Lisp?
• Re: How to get symbol-value from symbol-name
• Re: q. on reading bytes from "BIDIRECTIONAL-TERMINAL-STREAM"
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: q. on reading bytes from "BIDIRECTIONAL-TERMINAL-STREAM"
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: case confusion
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: case confusion
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: q. on reading bytes from "BIDIRECTIONAL-TERMINAL-STREAM"
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: RFC: Lisp/Scheme with less parentheses through Python-like significant indentation?
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: indentation levels with (format ...)
• Re: less parentheses --> fewer parentheses
• Re: less flames, fewer flames, or by any other name, ...
• Re: less flames, fewer flames, or by any other name, ...

September, 2000

• Re: Prefix vs Infix vs ... (was Re: `Understanding Common Lisp' book available...)

October, 2000

• Re: problem with delete
• Re: [Q] Beginner's question on recursive call in lisp.
• Re: [Q] Lisp beginner's another question, how to escape loop
• Re: random-list function
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: Efficiency?
• Re: Q: tail-recursive procedure to generate all permutations of a list
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: how to ring the bell?
• Re: writing out lists sharing values
• Re: Q: tail-recursive procedure to generate all permutations of a list
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: Efficiency?
• Re: figuring out # of args
• Re: Efficiency?
• Re: Q: tail-recursive procedure to generate all permutations of a list
• Re: problem with delete
• Re: any inspiring literature?
• Re: lisp problem...
• Re: any inspiring literature?
• Re: suitable index for near matches of strings?
• Re: Q: parsing strings
• Re: Q: parsing strings
• Re: Q: parsing strings
• Re: Q: parsing strings
• Re: any inspiring literature?
• Re: destroying CLOS objects
• Re: Off topic personal flame war.
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: ARRAY-TOTAL-SIZE-LIMIT: Need some data.
• Re: destroying CLOS objects
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: destroying CLOS objects
• Re: destroying CLOS objects
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: how does recursion work?
• Re: how does recursion work?
• Re: how does recursion work?
• Re: NT and Linux Implementations of Lisp
• Re: how does recursion work?
• Re: how does recursion work?
• Re: Lisp Interpreter in C
• Re: My opinion re flamebait
• Re: My opinion re flamebait
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: Function composition at run time
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Q: on hashes and counting
• Re: Q: on hashes and counting
• Re: Translate LISP to C
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: Name conflict. How can I solve this?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Q: on hashes and counting
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Lisp & C
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: basic question on lambda
• Re: basic question on lambda
• Re: Now I got perfect freehand drawing function ^^
• Re: Now I got perfect freehand drawing function ^^
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: object oriented LISP?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Now I got perfect freehand drawing function ^^
• Re: Allegro compilation warnings
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: My opinion re LISP
• Re: writing a search-algorithm in (X)Emacs-Lisp
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: object oriented LISP?
• Re: object oriented LISP?
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: Lisp & C
• Re: Resources & Compilers
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: struggling with READ-CHAR and LOOP (accumulating digits)
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: why there are no free-CLIM or free-IDE?
• Re: Q: example usage of EVAL-WHEN
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Q: how to turn a list of symbols into a function?
• Re: Now I got perfect freehand drawing function ^^
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Setting keys/values in alists
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: struggling with READ-CHAR and LOOP (accumulating digits)
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: Creating functions "on the fly"
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Seeking tools for generating C++ code from Lisp
• Re: Adding a charcter to the end of a string.
• Re: corba or sockets?

November, 2000

• Re: Seeking tools for generating C++ code from Lisp
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Scheme's "apply" [was: Re: Adding a charcter ... ]
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Setting keys/values in alists
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: On comparing apples and oranges (was: Q: on hashes and counting)
• Re: Setting keys/values in alists
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: Common Lisp Article in the November-Issue of the german Toolbox-Magazine
• Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: Q: on hashes and counting
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: Can I use Lisp?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: corba or sockets?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: Q: on hashes and counting
• Re: free ACL < 6.0 ?
• Franz Inc's attitude to the standard -- a request for clarification
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• A possible solution (was: Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.)
• Re: newbie needs simple help
• Re: How to display source of interpreted function
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• Re: (use-package) vs. (defpackage :use)
• Re: How to display source of interpreted function
• Re: Read-line strangeness
• Re: MAKE LISP CASE SENSITIVE???
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: LiSp SuCkS!! (wAs ...CaSe SenSitiviTy)
• Re: Using READ as an internet firewall [was Re: What case problem ...]
• Re: a problem with Franz's case suggestions
• Re: Low-level access to fd's in ACL
• Re: What case problem is Franz trying to solve?
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: quick question
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Pass by reference
• Re: Q: Function to convert 'abc+def = (abc def)
• Re: newbie problem with updating lists?
• Re: Using READ as an internet firewall [was Re: What case problem ...]
• Re: Alternative to Allegro CL (Re: Allegro CL 6.0 Trial Edition)
• Re: lisp data types?
• Re: Lisp as glue language?
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: partial to lisp - need small web page designed - nyc
• Re: Lisp as glue language?
• Re: (SETF (FUNCTION FOO) (FUNCTION BAR)) ?
• Re: (declare (thread-special *foo* ...))
• Re: Lisp with XML concrete syntax
• Re: ACL 6.0 Trial Edition ships with non ANSI reader behavior.
• Re: benefits of LISP?
• Re: (SETF (FUNCTION FOO) (FUNCTION BAR)) ?
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: benefits of LISP?
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: Lisp with XML concrete syntax
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: the economics of software support (slightly off-topic)
• Re: Lisp novice's question
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: ilisp verse eli
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the economics of software support (slightly off-topic)
• Re: Round to the nearest whole number?
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: Q: "on exit" processing
• Re: The myth of "innovation" [repost, new subject]

December, 2000

• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: What Lisp needs to beat Java, etc.
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: distinction?
• Re: ANSI spec brain damaged wrt case in dispatch macro char
• Re: distinction?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: distinction?
• Re: distinction?
• Re: Round to the nearest whole number?
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: distinction?
• Re: distinction?
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: ANSI spec brain damaged wrt case in dispatch macro char
• Re: How to concatenate with a String with fill-pointer
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: Round to the nearest whole number?
• Re: Q: FIND-ALL-IF
• Re: parameters with &aux
• Re: Are there "constructors" in CLOS?
• Re: Q: FIND-ALL-IF
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: Performance tuning
• Re: distinction?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Israel Thomas and Marcus G. Daniels and respect for people
• Re: LispWorks Pricing Information from Xanalys
• Re: Israel Thomas and Marcus G. Daniels and respect for people
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: NEWS FLASH : Naggum strikes again ! ( All beware his 20 cent popgun )
• Re: NEWS FLASH : Naggum strikes again ! ( All beware his 20 cent popgun )
• Re: NEWS FLASH : Naggum strikes again ! ( All beware his 20 cent popgun )
• Re: Israel Thomas and Marcus G. Daniels and respect for people
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Israel Thomas and Marcus G. Daniels and respect for people
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Israel Thomas and Marcus G. Daniels and respect for people
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Allocating on the stack and *only* on the stack
• Re: Q: ways to convert floats to integers (fixnums)
• Re: Q: How can I synchronize the point number?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Allocating on the stack and *only* on the stack
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Allocating on the stack and *only* on the stack
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Allocating on the stack and *only* on the stack
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Politeness please in this group.
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another cat
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Allocating on the stack and *only* on the stack
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Q: Degree instead of Radian?
• Re: hetrogenous binary streams
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Q: total addition within an array. (any function or macro?)
• Re: hetrogenous binary streams
• Re: Two Questions
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: Could CDR-coding be on the way back?
• Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
• Re: 12:31:23
• Re: methods redefenition

Part of the Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive