Subject: Re: setf & setq - revisiting From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 2000/04/17 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3164940958803214@naggum.no> * ;; h e l m e r . . . <assemblage@my-deja.com> | i'm revisitng my initial question because i found something on a scheme | site that clarifies (i hope) and gives me very basic definitions, | probelm is, i have to make sure it's lisp too . . . it isn't. on top of it, it's completely bogus, because ... | [note i have taken these statements where sheme's 'define' = 'setf' in | lisp and similarly 'set!' = 'setq'] ... this is completely unfounded. please forget comparing Scheme and Lisp for now, but feel free to try again when you know both exceedingly well on their own merits. #:Erik