Subject: Re: getting a full symbol name From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> Date: 2000/04/27 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <3165868104954676@naggum.no> * Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net> | Why complicate things to accomodate something that no sensible | person would do? well, thank you. maybe some sensible person saw that it would be a waste to create a dummy package to have symbols always print with a package qualifier? the answer is, of course: to get it right, always. | Does it really matter if keywords don't display as expected after | doing (in-package :keyword)? yes. this is Common Lisp, not Java or C++ or Perl. remember? #:Erik