Subject: Re: what's the standard way to make results in the REPL "invisible"
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:58:16 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3YqdnQfFIc9Fvg3anZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
szergling <senatorZergling@gmail.com> wrote: +--------------- | Besides all the suggestions previously mentioned in this thread, I | also use (null (expr)), which is quite quick to type in the REPL. +--------------- NOT is even shorter! ;-} ;-} -Rob ----- Rob Warnock <rpw3@rpw3.org> 627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/> San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607