2008
January
- Re: How do lispers do their GUI programming anyway?
- Re: What language(s) do you use at work?
- Re: What language(s) do you use at work?
- Re: What language(s) do you use at work?
- Re: Anybody willing to share their cl-ppcre regex for validating email address
- Re: Anybody willing to share their cl-ppcre regex for validating email address
- Re: Anybody willing to share their cl-ppcre regex for validating email address
- Re: SynFlood mitigation tool on linux
- Re: byte order
- Re: #;
- Re: #;
- Re: Noob Wonders: Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2
- Re: Difference between EQ and EQL
- Re: what's the standard way to make results in the REPL "invisible"
- Re: Difference between EQ and EQL
- Re: arc tangent
- Re: Regression test framework recommendation needed?
- Re: OT: Rails is shitty
- Re: OT: Rails is shitty
- Re: OT: Rails is shitty
- Re: OT: Rails is shitty
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: newbie exploring better ways
February
- Re: Arc already more popular than Python...
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: (loop initially ... getting non-ANSI CL warning
- Re: Vancouver Lisp Users Group meeting for February 2008 - Doing Evil Things with CL
- Re: Why there is no standard FIXNUMP?
- Re: Does Maxima work with NewLisp?
- Re: LOOP Sucks!
- Re: Testing for the EOF on byte streams
- Re: Why it gives me always different results
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: DON'T READ IF YOU NEED TO KEEP YOUR DEAD IN THE SAND (Arc info inside)
- Re: Practical encoding / decoding of text format
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Re: the necessity of Lisp's Objects?
- Re: DON'T READ IF YOU NEED TO KEEP YOUR DEAD IN THE SAND (Arc info inside)
- Re: Noobsday
- Re: DON'T READ IF YOU NEED TO KEEP YOUR DEAD IN THE SAND (Arc info inside)
- Re: What's up with Scheme macros?
- Re: Paul Graham's Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
- Re: What's up with Scheme macros?
- Re: Cells/Arc
- SFO Bay Area Lispniks 2008-02-19 dinner meeting
- SFO Bay Area Lispniks 2008-02-19 dinner meeting
- Re: Openmcl run-program args
- Re: need help for a simple macro
- Re: How does the compiler decide that its ok to delete unused functions?
- Re: Stupid lexicon tricks
- Re: Simple noob question.
- Re: Woohoo! My macros are now (semi) hygienic
- Re: Why Lisp?
- Re: Push/Pop for list tail
- Re: Optional code inclusion/evaluation
March
- Re: Mixing text and binary data
- Re: Let the endless macro debate resume! <groan>
- Re: equal test hash-tables vs nested hash tables
- Re: Woohoo! My macros are now (semi) hygienic
- Re: reading formatted text
- Re: reading formatted text
- Re: is free, open source software ethical?
- Re: undefined (asdf:system-license on clisp+cywgin
- Re: How to execute a function passed as a list
- Bay Area Lispniks (Peninsula Subclass) March 18th dinner meeting
- Re: CL package system not as nice as Java's, but is it reasonable for me to use it at all?
- Re: I would like for a list to evaluate some terms but not others
- Re: I would like for a list to evaluate some terms but not others
- Re: Stalin / New tutorial
- Re: MWUAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHA!
- Re: Managing many small libraries
- Re: lambda list question
- Re: Optional parameters in lambdas.
- Re: lambda list question
- Re: lambda list question
- Re: Reinventing My Own Wheel: Et Tu?
- Re: Mapcar'ing after splitting a list
- Re: Linefeed character in SBCL
April
- Re: what is up with the spam?
- Re: Two questions about eq
- Re: Have I reached critical mass?
- Re: Loading a web page with Lispworks
- Re: Loading a web page with Lispworks
- Re: coerce for arbitrary types
- Re: Implementation costs...
- Re: Inserting into a list ?
- Re: Thx, everyone
- Re: Inserting into a list ?
- Re: Pretty printing experts, pretty please?
- Re: Why is there no Common Scheme?
- Re: The empty list and the end of a list
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- Re: Oft-shared (perhaps?) Impressions of a Lisp Newbie
- Re: Saving screamer+ from the abyss.
- Re: Ruby performance woes
- Re: aaa
- Re: Ruby performance woes
- Re: How to make SIOD?
- Re: CLtL2 copyright question
- Re: How to make a copy of a list
May
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- Re: Iteration in lisp
- Re: Questions - Higer Order Functions
- Re: You want abbreviations? You can't handle abbreviations!
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: Lisp on an FPGA
- Re: Lisp on an FPGA
- Re: what si the gain with lambda here?
- Re: easi I/O in Scheme?
- Re: Any programmable way to ask whether a symbol has been proclaimed special?
- Re: What Part of Unspecified Does Kenny Not Understand?
- Re: delete command weirdness
- Re: builtin for generating list?
- Re: What Part of Unspecified Does Kenny Not Understand?
- CLHS "Data/" subdir [was: ...Unspecified...Kenny... ]
- Re: CLHS "Data/" subdir
- Re: Parallel Common-Lisp with at least 64 processors?
- Re: builtin for generating list?
- Re: How to make SIOD?
- Re: List diagrams -- Siebel and Touretzky draw them differently
- Re: List diagrams -- Siebel and Touretzky draw them differently
- Re: Ask a question about internal function
- Re: Ask a question about internal function
- Re: New notation
- Re: Separate the lisp environment from the shell (and other things)
- Re: Writing a portable copy-files
June
- Re: Visual Frameworks vs. Cells compared to Flow-Based Programming
- Re: Visual Frameworks vs. Cells compared to Flow-Based Programming
- Re: Lisp, 50th Birthday
- Re: Lisp, 50th Birthday
- Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: Multiprocessing in CMUCL
- Re: A problem with read-char
- Re: lisp exercises
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: P-Lisp rides again!
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
- Re: request comments: simple c program builder in lisp
- Re: pretty printing, a lost art?
- Re: basic emacs lisp idioms
- Re: pretty printing, a lost art?
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: Help Kenny! (Exit Yobbos)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: Best practices for efficient FP string building in CL?
- Re: One reason Lisp hasn't caught on: the name
- Re: common-lisp.net down?
- Re: How to avoid GC in tight numeric test loop? (CMUCL)
- Re: Nice processes on Unix
July
- Re: Lisp sucks!
- Re: Imagine All the Numbers, Living For...
- Re: Effective Scheme Objects Implementations
- Re: Lisp Application Server
- Re: Lisp Application Server
- Re: Hybrid RC/GC system to support real-time applications that can't afford pauses?
- Re: Lisp Application Server
- Re: some corrections Re: The Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Re: Bottleneck rule
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Re: Bottleneck rule
- Re: atoms in a list interned when called by another package. why?
- Re: SBCL is now faster than Java, as fast as Ocaml, and getting better
- Re: Internet LISP protocol
- Re: "Labelled" is Correct Because It's The English Spelling
- Re: Whoa
- Re: New List Interpreter
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: New List Interpreter
- Re: Lisp for dummies
- Re: Multiple evaluation
- Re: Multiple evaluation
- Re: No C!
- Re: McCarthy's original proposal for Lisp
- Re: How to resume a remote repl session? and edit running code?
- Re: How to resume a remote repl session? and edit running code?
- Re: Nested macros
- Re: paging all socket geniuses
August
- Re: Can special variables hi-jack function parameters?
- Re: best way to pass 2 numbers
- Re: ASDF...pwuahhahahahhahahahahah
- Re: Lisp also has a stutter?
- Re: ASDF...pwuahhahahahhahahahahah
- Re: SF/Silicon Valley meetups?
- Re: Trying to access SLOT-VALUEs in a LOOP
- Re: keyword to symbol in package
- Re: McCarthy's original proposal for Lisp
- Re: Xah on Lisp
- Re: Rewrap "> " lines from file ?
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: large hashtable crashes SBCL and GCL
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: large hashtable crashes SBCL and GCL
- Re: Extending STRING Class
- Re: reduced size symbols/keywords
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: How much tuning does regular lisp compilers do?
- Re: Machine-editable DOM/sexpr model specifying HTML output to be generated?
- Re: Fundamental Problems of Lisp
- Re: Which ones come first? - Macro question -
September
- Re: The Importance of Terminology's Quality
- Re: Which ones come first? - Macro question -
- Re: reduced size symbols/keywords
- Re: Traitor? Mole? The hounds are ready...
- Re: What is expensive about consing
- Re: Type checking problem
- Re: [OT] Etymology of cons
- Re: how would you name this macro?
- Re: What is expensive about consing
- Re: What is expensive about consing
- Re: What is expensive about consing
- Re: What is expensive about consing
- Re: How to read columns from a file?
- Re: A Proper Lexer
- Re: ANSI specification revision.
- Re: ANSI specification revision.
- Re: [Q] package-specific dispatch macro character
- Re: [Q] package-specific dispatch macro character
- Re: [Q] package-specific dispatch macro character
- Re: SBCL lead me on...
- Re: Security concerns with Common Lisp and EVAL
October
- Re: cl-weblocks on trac.common-lisp.net down or replaced?
- Re: Cons cell archaic!?
- Re: #! /usr/local/bin/lisp ?
- Re: Cons cell archaic!?
- Re: static, dynamic and implicitely typed languages
- Re: static, dynamic and implicitely typed languages
- Re: A question about lexical binding
- Re: A question about lexical binding
- Re: Lisp vs Java
- Re: Lisp vs Java
- Re: Lisp vs Java
- Re: stupid iper newbie question
- Re: Lisp 50 event at OOPSLA - worth going?
- Re: I want to create my own language
- Re: File I/O & String conversion - CLISP
- Re: File I/O & String conversion - CLISP
- Re: What is Lisp used for?
- Re: File I/O & String conversion - CLISP
- Re: CL-PDF and fractalconcept.com
- Re: create specialized vector from general array
- Re: How to programmatically exit?
- Re: Timing the execution of a program silently
- Re: naming conventions for slot accessors
- Re: How to programmatically exit?
- Re: naming conventions for slot accessors
- Re: How to Get Started?
- Re: lisp.org HyperSpec
- S-expr form of C
- Re: Global lexical variables?
- Re: S-expr form of C
- Re: S-expr form of C
- Re: S-expr form of C
- Re: Is it a bad sign...
- Re: S-expr form of C
November
- Re: S-expr form of C
- Re: DBGV macro (Att. Rob Warnock)
- Re: Alternatives
- Re: use-package & name conflict: why they are not deferred?
- Re: read-sequence from socket
- Re: read-sequence from socket
- Re: Basic List processing
- Re: Basic List processing
- Re: Basic List processing
- Re: OT: Call for Nominations -- Most Beautiful Piece of Code
- Re: Printing introduces newlines
- Re: Printing introduces newlines
- Re: Windows Common LISP
- Re: Windows Common LISP
- Re: parsing lambda lists
- Re: Alternatives 4
- Re: How to re-write code without using setq?
- Re: How are LISP programs commonly deployed?
- Re: Are shared-structure mutations actually important?
- Re: Are shared-structure mutations actually important?
- Re: Are shared-structure mutations actually important?
- Re: Are shared-structure mutations actually important?
- Re: Vancouver Lisp Users Group meeting for November 2008 - 0x20 Years of Lisp Systems, a Personal Journey
- Re: How are LISP programs commonly deployed?
- Re: Vancouver Lisp Users Group meeting for November 2008 - 0x20 Years of Lisp Systems, a Personal Journey
- Re: CASE with symbol evaluating to list?
December
- Re: Another Newbie Question !!!
- Re: how to cast integer into string ?
- Re: What websites use Lisp?
- Re: What websites use Lisp?
- Re: Another Newbie Question !!!
- Re: slime+cmucl installation process is horribly complicated
- Re: why cl packages are hard to use ?
- Re: why cl packages are hard to use ?
- Re: why cl packages are hard to use ?
- Re: why cl packages are hard to use ?
- Re: slime+cmucl installation process is horribly complicated
- Re: Mathematica 7 compares to other languages
- Re: The Dead End to Lisp?
- Re: The Dead End to Lisp?
- Re: `(,@10)
- Re: `(,@10)
- Re: reading binary files
- Re: why cl packages are hard to use ?
- Re: The Dead End to Lisp?
- Re: Making Lisp popular - can it be done?
- Re: Making Lisp popular - can it be done?
- Re: newbie hand holding requested please
- Re: newbie hand holding requested please
- Re: unload and "make clean" an asdf system?