Subject: Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
From: rpw3@rigden.engr.sgi.com (Rob Warnock)
Date: 29 Jul 2001 02:38:37 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Message-ID: <9jvsvd$73b96$1@fido.engr.sgi.com>
Boris Smilga  <smilga@ccil.org> wrote:
+---------------
| Btw., Scheme++ is not a good way to call it. The right name would be
| (+ 1 Scheme), just like [incr Tcl] etc. The notation itself gives an
| idea what that imaginary beast would be like.
+---------------

A thrown exception is what it is:

	> (+ 1 'Scheme)
	+: expects type <number> as 2nd argument, given: scheme
	> 


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, 31-2-510		<rpw3@sgi.com>
SGI Network Engineering		<http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/> [until 8/15]
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy.		Phone: 650-933-1673
Mountain View, CA  94043	PP-ASEL-IA

[Note: aaanalyst@sgi.com and zedwatch@sgi.com aren't for humans ]