2001
January
- Re: Integer-Arithemtics
- Re: Common Lisp and Python performance
- Re: Integer-Arithemtics
- Re: Common Lisp and Python performance
- Re: Any strongly-typed schemes out there?
- Re: Common Lisp and Python performance
- Re: copying a vector? (Stalin 0.9?)
- Re: special chars in string constant
- Re: Common Lisp and Python performance
- Re: Prime Numbers Program
- Re: Common Lisp and Python performance
- Re: copying a vector? (Stalin 0.9?)
- Re: Alogl thunks [was Re: copying a vector? (Stalin 0.9?)]
- Re: Lisp or Scheme?
- Re: Understanding lispishness
- Re: copying a vector? (Stalin 0.9?)
- Re: Lisp or Scheme?
- Re: Lisp code that writes non-lisp code
- Re: copying a vector? (Stalin 0.9?)
- Re: Variable Numbers of Arguments ?
- Re: Format padding
- Re: Variable Numbers of Arguments ?
- Re: Are there no good Scheme distributions?
- Re: Understanding lispishness
- Re: Lisp or Scheme?
- Re: Lisp or Scheme?
- Re: toplevel variables in CMUCL, get rid of the SPECIAL declaration!
- Re: loc measurement for Common Lisp?
- Re: sound in scheme
- Re: Mred - user interface - browser
- Re: Scheme evaluators for Windows
- Re: loc measurement for Common Lisp?
- Re: Mred - user interface - browser
- Re: Scheme evaluators for Windows
- Re: Thesis in LISP
- Re: Scheme evaluators for Windows
- Re: Scheme evaluators for Windows
- Re: DrScheme is great
- Re: define/lambda
- Re: DrScheme is great
- Re: How Close Can We Get A Lisp OS
February
- Re: Entire Text of SICP now Online
- Re: Scheme and Rational Numbers
- Re: Scheme and Rational Numbers
- Re: syntax-case and data transformation
- Re: Two philosophical questions about inheritance and objects.
- Re: destructuring-bind
- Re: Is Scheme a `Lisp'?
March
- Re: Help me convince skeptics! Lisp success stories wanted...
- Re: Remote collaborative programming
- Re: Separate namespaces [was: Re: please tell me the design faults]
- Re: Language intolerance (was Re: Is Scheme a `Lisp'?)
- Re: Misuse of Dynamic Variables
- Re: Emacs in CL
- Re: pedagogy question: introduce lists or pairs first?
- Re: quote , . , macros [Was : Re: why is (car ''abcde) evaluates to quote ?]
- Re: That result arg to dolist and dotimes...
- Re: Free Linux Lisp and Sockets
- Re: Uses of LISP
- Re: Iteration...
- Re: About ''"CooL": low-level macros considered useful
April
- Re: Scheme is difficult to teach
- Re: Newbie question
- Re: Scheme interpreter as server
- Re: URI parsing
- Re: About ''"CooL": low-level macros considered useful
- Re: compiler optimization techniques
- Re: Re: About ''"CooL": low-level macros considered useful
- Re: cons-stream definition
- Re: avoiding global vars.
- Re: TCP/IP, other protocols, callable from Scheme
- Re: Which implementations can stack-allocate closures?
- Re: TCP/IP, other protocols, callable from Scheme
- Re: int->string
- Re: using two types of garbage collectors for scheme interpreter
- Re: Problems with my interpreter
- Re: dalay-time function
- Re: Problems with my interpreter
- Re: Why choose Clisp over CMUCL?
May
- Re: stack allocation of environment
- Re: stack allocation of environment
- Re: need help writing function to find largest value of a list!
- Re: Kids These Days! (not much Scheme content, but an appeal to Educators)
- Re: follow up to value of list...help needed
- Re: Q: PLT/mzscheme socket question
- Re: Ideas for a project
- Re: Kids These Days! (not much Scheme content, but an appeal to Educators)
- primitive syntax [was: Re: Why CALL/CC is a procedure ]
- Re: Beginner's CLOS questions
- Re: Beginner's Language?
- Re: Hardware Description for Scheme processing Unit?
- Re: Beginner's Language?
- Re: Loops in macro definition
- sparse & dense [was: Re: Namespaces, packages, and methods ]
- Re: dynamic-wind, Was: Re: Strange thing about define-syntax II
- Re: call/1cc and call-with-exit-continuation
- Re: CMUCL CGI scripting
- Re: R6RS ?
- Re: CLISP to C?
- Re: environment variables
- Re: Lispworks deliver .exe file
- Re: Loops in macro definition
- Re: Not really a flame-bait
- Re: Dr Scheme define-macro problem
- Re: Choice LISP editor
- Re: Choice LISP editor
- Re: Lex/Yacc
- Re: Choice LISP editor
- Re: Choice LISP editor
June
- Re: Speed of memory management in Lispworks
- Re: ML, CL or Scheme as an extension language
- Re: ML, CL or Scheme as an extension language
- Re: Lisp# in .NET?
- Re: Macro-writing in CL
- Re: string reverse
- Re: Choice LISP editor
- Re: Macro-writing in CL
- Re: Question : QUOTE/external representation semantic ?
- Re: Scheme macros
- Re: Unification
- Re: Stalin and Bagley's shootout
- Re: Mod_lisp 2.0 released
- Re: Lisp# in .NET? Use SOAP
- Re: Unification
- Re: Unification
- Re: Calling MrEd directly?
July
- Re: Request of information about Lisp
- Re: (final?) PARTITION specification
- Re: Engineering Envy [was: Re: CL and UML]
- Re: The Scheme FAQ
- Re: using set!
- Re: POSIX, scheme, and cl
- Re: (final?) PARTITION specification
- off-topic S/F trivia [was: Re: special forms ]
- Re: off-topic S/F trivia [was: Re: special forms ]
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: compiling drscheme 1.03
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: Lisp# in .NET?
August
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: Apprenticeship [was Re: So, where's the "Javadoc" for COMMON Lisp?]
- Re: HtDP Question
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: Environment model of evaluation [was: Re: The Scheme FAQ]
- Re: bibop + generational gc
- Re: Newsgroup Protocols?
- Re: Spam from usenet? (was: How to quit cmucl)
- Re: Programming Style
- Re: keystroke idiom identifying (was: Programming Style)
- Re: Programming Style
- newLISP [was: Re: Running Lisp on Windows 98 ]
- Re: I'm not a comp scientist
- Re: format function for list
- Re: XML and lisp
- Re: XML and lisp
- Re: XML and lisp
- Re: Announce: A new Online Bibliography for Scheme
- Re: composing functions and permutations
- Re: Lisp for HTML HOWTO
September
- Re: lambda mysticism?
- Re: lambda mysticism?
- Re: Substring?
- Re: Top-level closures in scheme?
- Re: R5RS vs. "In Scheme, everything is a pointer"
- Re: Top-level closures in scheme?
- Re: R5RS vs. "In Scheme, everything is a pointer"
- Re: R5RS vs. "In Scheme, everything is a pointer"
- Re: MzScheme & Mac timing problem
- Re: low quality lisp books
- Re: call/cc in lisp
- Re: EQ and FIXNUMS
- Re: Denotational Semantics of R5RS vs extra pointers
- Re: What is a good scheme editor?
- Re: Schemely graphing calculators?
- Re: the simplest, small, non-0 integer
- Re: the simplest, small, non-0 integer
- Re: ZWEI (Re: emacs rules and vi sucks)
October
- Re: Continuations
- Re: ANN: MoshiMoshi Wiki Release
- Re: Question / comment about DIRECTORY
- Re: Tail recursion & CL
- Re: Tail recursion & CL
- Re: How to split a string (or arbitrary sequence) at each occurrence of a value.
- Re: New CL Regular Expression Package
November
- Re: Dynamic-wind
- Re: Dynamic-wind
- Re: MzScheme - easy sample of exception handling ?
- Re: Dynamic-wind
- Re: LISP format (happy to read)
- Re: LISP format (happy to read)
- Re: buffer-lists (was Re: Design patterns for Lisp)
- Re: Scheme 102
December
- Re: rotate-byte
- Re: 'define-list' with mzscheme
- Re: 'define-list' with mzscheme
- Re: Scheme advocacy: scheme vs. perl
- Re: 'define-list' with mzscheme
- Re: Scheme advocacy: scheme vs. perl
- Re: continuations are mandatory for compilers?
- Re: Truenames and relativity (theoretical question)
- Re: newbie asks: why CL rather than scheme?
- Re: New Lisp ?