Kaz Kylheku <kaz@ashi.footprints.net> wrote:
+---------------
| > However, the exclamation mark in set! is similarly easy to
| > pick out, so the relative advantage of := which Daniel refers to,
| > doesn't really exist in languages with set!, i.e. Scheme.
|
| The Scheme operator set! is not really equivalent to the setf
| or to a generic := in another language like Dylan.
+---------------
I don't recall anyone saying it was. Scheme "set!" *is*
directly equivalent to the "setq" of Common Lisp, though.
(Though as someone else mentioned, there's a SRFI draft in
the works for adding some "setf"-like functionality to "set!".
So maybe someday...)
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock, 30-3-510 <rpw3@sgi.com>
SGI Network Engineering <http://www.meer.net/~rpw3/>
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy. Phone: 650-933-1673
Mountain View, CA 94043 PP-ASEL-IA
[Note: aaanalyst@sgi.com and zedwatch@sgi.com aren't for humans ]