allegro-cl archives 1998-4-10 | home index prev H thread-prev K thread-next J next L |
From: Erik Naggum Subject: Re: Linux version of ACL, 4.3 problems Date: 1998-4-10 10:33 * Roy M. Turner | But there's the problem. I'm not about to move all our code, only some | of which is written in Lisp, from Sun to Linux until I know that the | Linux version of ACL will be a full product, not only with support (which | I don't use very much at all) but with the same upgrade path as the Unix | version. So I'm not going to invest the money or (especially) the time, | come to rely on the Linux version, only to find later that it is becoming | increasingly out-of-date and possibly unsupported. If they offer the | product, then it makes sense, but not before, at least not to me. oh, I understand. I went through a long process with my sales rep at Franz Inc that culminated in being promised support and maintenance for the foreseeable future when we need it, all in the understanding that a product would come out, with a lot of ifs: IF Linux is a viable platform as such, IF a suitable number of customers want to pay for Allegro CL on Linux, IF there is a suitable consensus among Linux installations what to use (there's a _terrible_ mess with almost as many configurations as there are machines), etc, etc. right now, however, Linux will save a project, and Allegro CL on it will cut the costs on half, and all we needed was an assurance that we could keep this running for a while and get a suitable warning if and when Franz Inc decides to productize Linux or not -- at worst we could perhaps invest in a stabler computer and operating system after all the development costs had been absorbed over a few years. this is a fairly specific need and set of conditions, so I fully understand that others may have a different view on this. I'm just trying to show Franz Inc as hard as I can that Linux is worth going for, and that basically means getting more people to trust the Franz Inc/Linux combo, but I also understand how hard that can be -- and I have the above alluded-to long process to prove it! let's hope the Linux world is ready for Allegro CL! otherwise, we'd have to go for CMUCL on Linux and they have _years_ ahead of them to be as good as Allegro CL is, although they do pay more attention to conformance. #:Erik |
(
1
CoRey /
Linux version of ACL, 4.3 problems
4/9
)
(
2
Daniel Solaz/
...
4/10
)
(
3
Alex Athanasopoulos /
...
4/13
)
(
4
Daniel Solaz/
...
4/13
)
(
5
CoRey /
...
4/11
)
(
6
Arthur Flatau /
...
4/12
)
(
7
Kenneth D. Forbus/
...
4/12
)
(
8
Arthur Flatau /
...
4/10
)
(
9
Erik Naggum /
...
4/10
)
(
10
Roy Turner /
...
4/10
)
(
11
Erik Naggum /
...
4/10
)
(
12
Roy Turner /
...
4/10
)
(
13
Erik Naggum /
...
4/10
)
(
14
Erik Naggum /
...
4/9
)
|