1996
January, 1996
- Re: Reading a sequence of (characters|bytes) from a file in Common Lisp
- Re: Gnu Common Lisp HELP!
- Re: Gnu Common Lisp HELP!
- Re: Why garbage collection?
- Re: Gnu Common Lisp HELP!
- Re: Why garbage collection?
February, 1996
- Re: Novice question -- inserting element in list
- Re: clever flatten?
- Re: How do I write a non-blocking 'sleep-for' in elisp?
- Re: efficiency of Lisp compared to other progr. lang.?
- Re: efficiency of Lisp compared to other progr. lang.?
March, 1996
- Re: Q:reference values
- Re: Q: local static variables?
- the character type
- Re: input/output
- Re: help me with this function
April, 1996
- Re: why no big-float?
- Re: why no big-float?
- (declare (lexical ...))
- Re: (declare (lexical ...))
- Re: How to read lots of data from disk quickly?
- function call conventions
- Re: function call conventions
May, 1996
- Re: WANTED: Classic Texts on Lisp
- Re: Future of LISP in NatLang/AI
- #D
- Re: accessing second return value off of read-from-string
June, 1996
- Re: accessing second return value off of read-from-string
- Re: Disabling colon in readtable?
- Re: New Common Lisp, Lisp-to-C translation, Lisp library for C
July, 1996
- Re: saving lisp object into a file
- Re: List --> String????
- Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
- Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
- Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
- Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
- Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?
- Re: Iteration constructs that handle multiple values?
- Re: Need another Lisp? (was Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?)
- Re: Need another Lisp? (was Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?)
August, 1996
- Re: Need another Lisp? (was Re: IS(O-)Lisp status?)
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: question
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- char-upcase settable?
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: char-upcase settable?
- printing lists
- Re: char-upcase settable?
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: EVAL Implementations
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- CLISP pretty-printing
- Re: Strings to Lists ???
- Re: EVAL Implementations
September, 1996
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Unclear thought is the problem, not the solution
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Lisp is alive, was "Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation"
- Re: Exploding a string into a list of character atoms?
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Exploding a string into a list of character atoms?
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
October, 1996
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: Common LISP: The Next Generation
- Re: Students!
- Re: Java vs. CL speed (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: Lisp is alive
- Re: ANSI CLISP: strengths vs. weaknesses?
- Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software
- Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software
- Re: standardization (Re: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software)
- Re: Measuring time in CMU Common Lisp
- readable syntax for control characters in strings
- Re: readable syntax for control characters in strings
November, 1996
- Re: E-lisp primitives unextendible [was: Lisp versus C++ for AI. software]
- Re: readable syntax for control characters in strings
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: Lisp is not an interpreted language
- Re: String Question?
- Re: list to string etc.
- inlined function calls
December, 1996
- Re: list to string etc.
- Re: Mergesort: why's it efficient?
- Re: Mergesort: why's it efficient?
- Re: '(a b c) and (list a b c)
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: LISP compiler for Windows or DOS?
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: How can I make my lisp program executable?
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: superior(?) programming languages
- Re: Do something. Now.
Part of the Erik Naggum comp.lang.lisp archive